« Feds fail New York | Main | Money for nothing »

November 27, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a010536214f60970b013489908de1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A modest proposal (updated):

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Brian

It's interesting how you can rig a poll simply be voiding it of context. I wonder how much the poll results would've been different if the question had included the factual clause, "for the first time in 12 years."

Bob Conner

Hi Brian. I don't agree that the poll was rigged. Another piece of information that could have been included was the current salaries of judges, which are far above what the average state resident makes. I guess the legislators agree with you and not me, since passing this was one of the few things they did in the special sessions(s). Meanwhile, they expanded the budget gap to $10 billion, according to the Paterson administration. Unfortunately, Paterson is still dishing out his own pork, and he and the legislators seem to think there's plenty of money to give judges a raise.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Bookmark and Share
Blog powered by TypePad

Become a Fan